<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kallaway: Haley&#8217;s grievance &#8220;malicious&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.dailyemerald.com/2009/08/12/kallaway-haleys-grievance-malicious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.dailyemerald.com/2009/08/12/kallaway-haleys-grievance-malicious/</link>
	<description>ODE News, Sports, Scene &#38; Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:47:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Monica</title>
		<link>http://blogs.dailyemerald.com/2009/08/12/kallaway-haleys-grievance-malicious/comment-page-1/#comment-969</link>
		<dc:creator>Monica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 06:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.dailyemerald.com/?p=1740#comment-969</guid>
		<description>I thought Kallaway&#039;s response was well-written (with the exception of a few grammatical errors); I liked that most of her response was factually-supported and that she cited previous Court rulings to emphasize her arguments. The funny thing is that Haley already stated she didn&#039;t expect to actually impeach Kallaway, but that she wanted to bring her &quot;dirty laundry&quot; to light - so isn&#039;t this entire grievance moot? Gower and Diamond had already brought to light that she hadn&#039;t sent out her list of goals... and, really, if she wanted to bash Kallaway so publicly, she probably could&#039;ve just talked to the ODE and gotten some kind of blurb written. The executive has more important things to worry about than a moot grievance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Kallaway&#8217;s response was well-written (with the exception of a few grammatical errors); I liked that most of her response was factually-supported and that she cited previous Court rulings to emphasize her arguments. The funny thing is that Haley already stated she didn&#8217;t expect to actually impeach Kallaway, but that she wanted to bring her &#8220;dirty laundry&#8221; to light &#8211; so isn&#8217;t this entire grievance moot? Gower and Diamond had already brought to light that she hadn&#8217;t sent out her list of goals&#8230; and, really, if she wanted to bash Kallaway so publicly, she probably could&#8217;ve just talked to the ODE and gotten some kind of blurb written. The executive has more important things to worry about than a moot grievance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
